Educational content on VJDementia is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

AD/PD 2023 | TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4: direct comparison of donanemab and aducanumab

Stephen P. Salloway, MD, MS, Butler Hospital & Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, discusses the main outcomes of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4 trial (NCT05108922). This trial is unique in directly comparing two anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in the same study: donanemab and aducanumab. Key findings included the degree of amyloid lowering at 6 months, which was significantly higher with donanemab than aducanumab (37.9% vs. 1.6% clearance rates, respectively). Substantial amyloid lowering differences at this time could be because of the faster titration of donanemab. The rate of amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) was similar between the two drugs. Donanemab was also shown to significantly decrease plasma p-tau 217, which indicates the potential of p-tau 217 as a marker for treatment response. Further results are expected at 12- and 18-months of the trial, when the patients receiving aducanumab will have reached a higher exposure to the drug. This interview took place at the AD/PD™ 2023 congress in Gothenburg, Sweden.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

It’s unique in that it actually compares two different amyloid lowering antibodies in the same trial. The main outcome here was the degree of amyloid lowering at six months. The trial is ongoing and there will be 12-month data reported this summer and there’ll be 18-month data to follow after that. These are patients with early Alzheimer’s disease that either followed the FDA guidelines for aducanumab or the clinical trial criteria for donanemab, and they were both dosed monthly following the titration schedule as outlined either in the prescribing information or trial protocol...

It’s unique in that it actually compares two different amyloid lowering antibodies in the same trial. The main outcome here was the degree of amyloid lowering at six months. The trial is ongoing and there will be 12-month data reported this summer and there’ll be 18-month data to follow after that. These are patients with early Alzheimer’s disease that either followed the FDA guidelines for aducanumab or the clinical trial criteria for donanemab, and they were both dosed monthly following the titration schedule as outlined either in the prescribing information or trial protocol. So that meant there was a slower titration for aducanumab that takes place over six months, where people on the donanemab arm got to the higher dose earlier and had greater exposure to higher dose.

The main outcome, it showed that donanemab had a significantly higher rate of amyloid lowering at six months than aducanumab and that seemed to be relatively safe. The rates of ARIA were similar between the two drugs, so donanemab was able, using that titration scheme, a quicker titration scheme, was able to get more substantial amyloid lowering in a shorter amount of time, and that may be important. Again, the degree of amyloid lowering and the speed of which it’s lowered, and obviously it needs to be done safely, could be important for clinical benefit.

Another thing that was encouraging is that donanemab also showed that there was a significant decrease in p-tau217 in the blood. So, this may be a marker of target engagement and perhaps of treatment response, so we need more information for that. Then aducanumab, we’ll see how the data looks at 12 months when there’s a higher exposure to aducanumab. But at least at six months, donanemab had a greater effect on amyloid lowering and on lowering of p-tau, without causing additional safety concerns. At least in this data set, there were no deaths related to the ARIA.

Read more...